<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SolidlyStated.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solidlystated.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solidlystated.com</link>
	<description>Hardware. Software. Solid.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Logitech G27 Racing Wheel Solid Settings (PC) by SolidlyStated</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/hardware/logitech-g27-best-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-7069</link>
		<dc:creator>SolidlyStated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=459#comment-7069</guid>
		<description>Try switching your setting for combined pedals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try switching your setting for combined pedals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Logitech G27 Racing Wheel Solid Settings (PC) by SolidlyStated</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/hardware/logitech-g27-best-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-7068</link>
		<dc:creator>SolidlyStated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=459#comment-7068</guid>
		<description>paddle shifters are sequential - up and down 1 gear at a time. H shifters have a direction to push for each gear at any time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paddle shifters are sequential &#8211; up and down 1 gear at a time. H shifters have a direction to push for each gear at any time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Logitech G27 Racing Wheel Solid Settings (PC) by paul</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/hardware/logitech-g27-best-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-7067</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 07:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=459#comment-7067</guid>
		<description>hi
 im new to this sort of stuff i have downloaded disc and rfactor which came with my g27 steering wheel onto my computer which i bought a couple of weeks ago and i am stuck in the garage with the rev counter going from reverse to nuetral and back every thing else seems to work what is the answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
 im new to this sort of stuff i have downloaded disc and rfactor which came with my g27 steering wheel onto my computer which i bought a couple of weeks ago and i am stuck in the garage with the rev counter going from reverse to nuetral and back every thing else seems to work what is the answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sync Apps Without Deleting Existing Apps by John</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/hardware/sync-apps-without-deleting-existing-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-7065</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=2079#comment-7065</guid>
		<description>yes! This is the info I should have received directly from Apple!  Instead I had to google it.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes! This is the info I should have received directly from Apple!  Instead I had to google it.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Darksiders PC Black Screen at Startup by Artur</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/software/darksiders-pc-black-screen-at-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-7060</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=1772#comment-7060</guid>
		<description>The common fix worked for me.Thank you very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The common fix worked for me.Thank you very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dead Island Server Room Mission Stuck by dickmunch</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/software/dead-island-server-room-mission-stuck/comment-page-1/#comment-7059</link>
		<dc:creator>dickmunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=3139#comment-7059</guid>
		<description>Thanks a bunch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a bunch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nvidia GT 520 vs GT 430 by Megaman</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/hardware/gt-520-vs-gt-430/comment-page-1/#comment-7057</link>
		<dc:creator>Megaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=2749#comment-7057</guid>
		<description>I agree with your statement, solely if your intention is to make an HTPC for video playback(GT 520 is enough and plays videos at 1080p smoothly).
If you are talking about gaming, you might need the power of the GT 430, it still depends on the games you are playing/planning to play, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your statement, solely if your intention is to make an HTPC for video playback(GT 520 is enough and plays videos at 1080p smoothly).<br />
If you are talking about gaming, you might need the power of the GT 430, it still depends on the games you are playing/planning to play, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nvidia GT 520 vs GT 430 by jonathan</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/hardware/gt-520-vs-gt-430/comment-page-1/#comment-7056</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 07:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=2749#comment-7056</guid>
		<description>i can say that 520 is better because it has a modern GPU Design and cost less power,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can say that 520 is better because it has a modern GPU Design and cost less power,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HTML Favicon Proper Usage by SolidlyStated</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/design/html-favicon-proper-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-7055</link>
		<dc:creator>SolidlyStated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=2485#comment-7055</guid>
		<description>If your server is set up properly and you use a relative path, you don&#039;t need to be concerned about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your server is set up properly and you use a relative path, you don&#8217;t need to be concerned about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HTML Favicon Proper Usage by Scriptster</title>
		<link>http://solidlystated.com/design/html-favicon-proper-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-7054</link>
		<dc:creator>Scriptster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solidlystated.com/?p=2485#comment-7054</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I was just curious if some user agents could get &quot;confused&quot; (for lack of a better word) between, for example, a non-www and www versions of the site. Say, you type &quot;example.com&quot; in the address field and the favicon.ico for non-www would load. Then the browser would receive a redirect to www- version of the same site but they may not get a favicon.ico again. I guess, the concern may not even be so much with your &quot;normal&quot; browsers like IE, Firefox etc, as with other things that crawl your site and take favicon.ico along. For example, RSS readers often do that. So, if there was a more reliable way to ensure that a little tiny piece of your branding comes along with your syndicated content, I would use it. Hope it makes sense :) Anyhow, I&#039;ll just have to try it both ways on a couple of sites and see if I can detect any difference in results.
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I was just curious if some user agents could get &#8220;confused&#8221; (for lack of a better word) between, for example, a non-www and www versions of the site. Say, you type &#8220;example.com&#8221; in the address field and the favicon.ico for non-www would load. Then the browser would receive a redirect to www- version of the same site but they may not get a favicon.ico again. I guess, the concern may not even be so much with your &#8220;normal&#8221; browsers like IE, Firefox etc, as with other things that crawl your site and take favicon.ico along. For example, RSS readers often do that. So, if there was a more reliable way to ensure that a little tiny piece of your branding comes along with your syndicated content, I would use it. Hope it makes sense <img src='http://solidlystated.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyhow, I&#8217;ll just have to try it both ways on a couple of sites and see if I can detect any difference in results.<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

